Re: [GNU-linux-libre] what of the distros that have already asked for consideration or have been partially evaluated?

[bill-auger]

krt send this to me personally - i will repost

On 03/21/2018 03:22 PM, KRT Listmaster wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 12:54 PM, bill-auger wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> info - it is not clear though if freeslack or libertybsd have explicitly
>> expressed interest - without combing over the history myself, does
>> anyone know the history of these on this list?
>
> Yes, definitely the FreeSlack devs expressed explicit interest on this
> list,
>
>
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2016-08/msg00003.html
>
> and I would say the same for LibertyBSD as well.
>
>
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2014-12/msg00002.html
>
>
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2015-02/msg00003.html
>
> thanks,
>
> - krt
>


BTW - the actual OP for free-slack is here:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2016-07/msg00021.html


ok thanks krt - those links are pretty convincing - so the real question
is "should these be grandfathered into the process and their entries
moved from "Distros that have requested consideration" to "Distros
currently being evaluated by the community" and have an evaluation
results page created for them immediately - or should they be asked to
start from the begining of the new protocol by sending email to the GNU
webmasters

if bypassing the GNU webmasters for these, the new protocol requires at
least that each be assigned a community review manager now

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature