[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code
From: |
Tim Smith |
Subject: |
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:44:16 GMT |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) |
On 2004-06-14, Chris Jefferson <caj@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote:
> Now, we realise that evil people could always just ignore the GPL, that
> isn't a fault of the GPL. But are these two things possible?
They can also ignore any non-GPL license, such as what your friends want to
use. Your first two questions basically have no bearing on choice of
license.
> Also, I notice that we must distribute the source in a version such that
> it can be compiled by the user. Does this mean:
Assuming it is all your code, you can distribute it any way you want. GPL,
or whatever license you use, is what *OTHER* people have to follow, not you.
--
--Tim Smith
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, John Hasler, 2004/06/29
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2004/06/29
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Byron A Jeff, 2004/06/29
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/06/29
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Chris Jefferson, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Barry Margolin, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Paul Jarc, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Barry Margolin, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Paul Jarc, 2004/06/29