|
From: | threeseas |
Subject: | Why are software patents wrong? |
Date: | Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:18:43 GMT |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626) |
Two catagories of answers: symptoms and cause or from the other direction: cause and effect.Seems to me many have found arguement against software patents that only deal with the symptoms or effect of software patents, rather then the more fundamental underlying reasons why software doesn't qualify for patent status.
So how about it?why do you think software should not be patentable? and is your answer cause or effect?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |