[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are software patents wrong?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Why are software patents wrong? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:33:06 +0200 |
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
[...]
> Software is the implementation of an algorithm, which is not patentable.
Really? Sez who?
> Copyright law is more suitable for the protection of software.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=40A37619.EFFC5C1F%40web.de
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, (continued)
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, threeseas, 2004/10/16
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, Bjoern, 2004/10/16
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, ray, 2004/10/16
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, Liam Slider, 2004/10/16
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, Paul Hovnanian P.E., 2004/10/16
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, Paul Hovnanian P.E., 2004/10/18
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, threeseas, 2004/10/18
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/10/18
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/10/18
- Message not available
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, threeseas, 2004/10/18
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/10/18
- Message not available
- Re: Why are software patents wrong?, threeseas, 2004/10/20