[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:22:27 +0100 |
robert_dodier@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> I don't mean to rain on the parade but I wonder
> if we can get back on topic. I'd specifically like
> to discuss Section 6, paragraph 1 of the LGPL.
There's nothing to discuss. It doesn't apply. FSF's
"hereditary"-by-links theory is a joke (just like
SCO's derivative theory).
http://tinyurl.com/xles
http://tinyurl.com/xjw8
http://tinyurl.com/2xg5t
regards,
alexander.
- LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Robert Dodier, 2004/12/01
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/01
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, robert_dodier, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, John Hasler, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/03
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, John Hasler, 2004/12/02