[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:07:07 +0100 |
There is nothing unusual about copyright law distinguishing between
groups of people. You can show a movie at home and let your
wife/SO watch it with you without the copyright holder have a claim
that you are having an unauthorized public display. Do you think
that if you showed the movie at a public event you could say that
all the viewers were part of the family of man?
Once again, people are starting to compare apples to rocks. The
distribution terms for movies are different than to software. So
please stop comparing two different things that have nothing in
relation.
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/06
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/06
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/04
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/04
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/04
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/01
Message not availableRe: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/02
Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/02