[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wallace's reply brief
From: |
Ferd Burfel |
Subject: |
Re: Wallace's reply brief |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:17:37 -0500 |
"Ferd Burfel" <ferd@burfel.net> wrote in message
news:r1aAg.17644$%7.6438@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Alexander Terekhov" <terekhov@web.de> wrote in message
> 44D05746.919A1DAA@web.de">news:44D05746.919A1DAA@web.de...
>>
>> Ferd Burfel wrote:
>
> Something like the way no third-party can avoid being bound by the terms
> of the GPL in order to receive permission to modify and distribute GPLed
> code? Is Wallace really helping his case by mentioning this?
Unless.....
Is Wallace implying that the GPL is somehow illegal because it places
restrictions on TRUE "non-parties" because it says they can't modify and
distribute the code unless they accept it's terms?
Surely not. MS says you can't even USE their software (much less modify and
distribute it) unless you agree to the terms of the license, while the GPL
doesn't have that restriction, making MS's license more restrictive to
"non-parties" in that respect.
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, (continued)
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/01
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/08/02
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, John Hasler, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief,
Ferd Burfel <=
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/03
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/03
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, John Hasler, 2006/08/03
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, John Hasler, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/04