[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wallace's reply brief
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Wallace's reply brief |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:59:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ferd Burfel writes:
> No, he doesn't. But all a win in IBM et.al. would do for him would be to
> have an injunction against IBM et.al., "strangers may do as they
> please,". He may regret pointing that out.
> To get at the GPL, he would have to win against FSF.
That would only get him an injunction against the FSF. The GPL is a model
license. When I license a work of mine to you under the GPL only you and I
are involved. The fact that the license I grant you is word for word
identical to the one the FSF uses for gcc is irrelevant. They are two
seperate licenses.
> Where I'm from it's considered bad form, not to mention hazardous to
> one's freedom, to make such statements about judges.
In the US it is bad form but quite safe.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, (continued)
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, John Hasler, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/04
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/05
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/05
- Re: Wallace's reply brief,
John Hasler <=
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/07