[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is source ?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: What is source ? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:13:56 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> The only person with standing to sue anybody over non-compliance with
> the GPL is the copyright holder himself.
Each party to the GPL contract can sue for non-compliance, retard.
-----
An intellectual property license is a contract. In re: Aimster Copyright
Litigation, 334 F.3d 643, 644 (7th Cir. 2003) (“If a breach of contract
(and a copyright license is just a type of contract) . . . ”); see also
McCoy v. Mitsuboshi Cutlery, Inc., 67 F.3d 917, 920 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
(“Whether express or implied, a license is a contract").
-----
Go contact German GPL enforcer Welte and the gang at ifross (his
attorneys), the GPL is a contract (LizenzVERTRAG) in Germany as well.
regards,
alexander.
Re: What is source ?, Vincent Rivière, 2006/08/12
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/12
- Re: What is source ?,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14