[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: license question with non-GPL library
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: license question with non-GPL library |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:12:14 +0200 |
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
[...]
> Distributors of GPL code are required to make available the full
> source code of all modules,
All modules constituting a GPL derivative work (or original GPL'd
stuff).
One must be a total idiot to think that a preexisting BSD library is
a derivative work of the GPL'd "application". Are you a total idiot,
Merijn?
regards,
alexander.
- license question with non-GPL library, Scott, 2006/08/15
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16