Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus' gang: "abandon the current GPLv3 process before it becomes too late"

[Alexander Terekhov]

Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
> Your predictions fall short of reality, or is it reality that falls
> short of your predictions?

There's nothing particular unreal to expect sensible judgments from
courts. According to the GPL-moronized court in Frankfurt, eventhough 
the obligations part of GPL Section 2 is "möglicherweise nichtige Teil" 
(i.e. possibly void and unenforceable part) due to illegal price-fixing 
and viral contracting in violation of EU Art 81, the defendant must be 
guilty of "copyright infringement" for not complying with it 
nevertheless. Uh, morons. Suppose that instead of antitrust violating
part, the license would try to impose an obligation to include in a
distibution some child porno, illegal drugs, or some such... fine, no 
problem at all: still guilty of "copyright infringement" for 
"noncompliance". Uh, GPL-moronized retards.

regards,
alexander.