Re: SFLC: "a penumbra"

[Alexander Terekhov]

rjack wrote:
[...]
> One must be careful to define "Component[]" in context.

http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2006/2pet/6invit/2005-1056.pet.ami.inv.html

"Although the court of appeals correctly held that software can be a 
component of a patented invention, it erred in holding that the creation 
of copies of software overseas, based on a master version provided from 
the United States, constitutes the supply of those software copies from 
the United States."

So I gather that accoording to USDOJ, supply by means of 

http://www.research.ibm.com/quantuminfo/teleportation/

would NOT constitute "supply" for the purposes of 35 U.S.C. 271(f) 
either. Teleporters will undo 35 U.S.C. 271(f)! USDOJ should better
inform the Congress know about that!!!

regards,
alexander.

--
"Don't Buy Harry Potter Books"

   -- http://www.stallman.org