[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:12:26 +0100 |
me@davecotter.com wrote:
[...]
> you can totally blow off the GPL and treat it like LGPL??
------
[...]
sections of the LGPL are an impenetrable maze of technological
babble. They should not be in a general-purpose software license.
[...]
The LGPL concedes that the GPL is a better, more appropriate license,
and it allows any licensees to convert to the GPL at their option:
You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General
Public License
[...]
The LGPL, therefore, is an anomaly
------
http://www.rosenlaw.com/Rosen_Ch06.pdf
See the light now?
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, me, 2007/03/10
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/03/10
- Re: GPL question, me, 2007/03/12
- Re: GPL question,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL question, me, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/03/14
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/03/14
- Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/03/10