[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commercial Invocation
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Commercial Invocation |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:31:17 +0100 |
rjack wrote:
[...]
> property sharing. At that point it's Federal Court lawsuit time.
> Before you launch your product set aside sufficient money for
> attorney fees to defend against his silly-assed ideologically
> based claims.
Just FYI: Katzen et al. managed to get some fees back:
"the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants motions to dismiss, DENIES
Defendants motion to bifurcate without prejudice, GRANTS
Defendants special motions to strike, and AWARDS attorneys fees
in the amount of $14,486.68 for Defendants Katzer and KAM and
$16,976.25 for Defendant Russell."
http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/docket/111.pdf
regards,
alexander.
--
"Because of their informal and diffuse nature, open source groups are
vulnerable to theft of their intellectual property. That theft, in the
form of copyright infringement, happened in this case, and Jacobsen
sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin Katzer and KAMIND's
infringement."
-- BRIEF OF ROBERT G. JACOBSEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CAFC 2008-1001
Re: Commercial Invocation, John Hasler, 2008/01/25