[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:32:12 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Q: Am I bound by the GPL, by merely downloading, without affirmatively
> > accepting the GPL, yes or no?
>
> No.
>
> > Suppose that right now I've made a hardcover copy of a work
> > affirmatively made available to me (I've affirmatively accepted the
> > license contract) under the license to make only paperback copies.
> >
> > Q: Am I violating the scope of the license by making hardcover copies
> > instead of (agreed) paperbacks only?
>
> Yes.
>
> > What does this have to do with the GPL, Hyman?
>
> You can't make copies of GPLed code and convey those copies
> to others unless you do so under the terms of the GPL.
You're mistaken, Hyman. 17 USC 109.
Click here:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
and
http://web-sniffer.net/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.verizon.net%2Fwebdownload%2Ffirmware%2Fupgrades%2Factiontec%2520gateway%2F4.0.16.1.56.0.10.7-MI424WR.rmt&submit=Submit&http=1.1&gzip=yes&type=GET&uak=0
You, sweetie. :-)
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/02
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/02
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/02
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/02
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/02
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05