[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:13:22 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/courtweb/pdf/D02NYSC/01-07482.PDF
> > ... From the user's vantage point, SmartDownload could be analogized
> > to a free neighborhood newspaper, readily obtained from a sidewalk
> > box or supermarket counter without any exchange with a seller or
> > vender.
>
> I'm glad you made the free paper analogy. What do you imagine the
> reaction of the courts would be if someone showed up at the box
> and took all the papers and started reselling them for pulp?
Hyman, Hyman, how could one possibly "take all the papers" in the case
of downloading (a denial-of-service attack aside for a moment)?
Your "took all the papers" hypothetical is inapplicable to the case at
hand.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Andrew Halliwell, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Andrew Halliwell, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Doug Mentohl, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06