|
From: | amicus_curious |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:14:36 -0500 |
"Alan Mackenzie" <acm@muc.de> wrote in message news:gnp50j$2qen$2@colin2.muc.de...
What negative publicity? Verizon is probably attacked daily by pissants like the SFLC over nonsense issues. They seem to have a policy of fighting one and all. Verizon's customers only care if they can get enough bars in the boonies.The Verizon website, <http://www.verizon.com/>, appears to contain no mention of their "victory". You'd think they'd put up something to counteract the negative publicity, surely? Or to discourage future "fools" from embroiling them in litigation? Perhaps the management of Verizon don't see it in terms of a victory.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |