|
From: | amicus_curious |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:45:29 -0500 |
"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message news:w4Uol.33009$cI2.27361@newsfe09.iad...
Rjack wrote:even if they must dismiss their clients case WITH PREJUDICEIn every one of the SFLC's cases the defendants or their agents made the GPLed sources available.
Actiontec was not an agent of Verizon. Verizon did not make the GPL for Actiontec devices available. Ergo your statement is false.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |