Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[... GPL ...]
There is no contract
Let the judges in Munich and Frankfurt know about that, dear
GNUtian dak.
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
(in English)
http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_munich_gpl.pdf
http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
Pg 11, my dear. "Die GPL ... offer ... acceptance ... § 151
BGB."
Both panels erred regarding the relevance of assumed invalidity
of the GPL 2b***, however.
(From licensed German legal professional):
Uh, you cite a comment dissenting with a court decision as
precedence?
That's not particularly impressive. Not even for your standards.