|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:24:21 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > >> Also there is no "evasion of an interpretation of the GPL" since >> the GPL is not even under dispute. It would only be under >> dispute if the defendants claimed compliance as a defense. The >> cases up to now have been cut&dry sufficiently for that not to be >> a viable option. >> >> So even if the SFLC carried on, they'd get an interpretation of >> the validity of copyright law in general rather than of the GPL. >> Nothing interesting in that. >> > > Would the GPL be construed as a contract and interpreted under state > law? Do you even read what you are replying to? If the defendant does not claim compliance, the GPL is not relevant to the case. -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |