Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean

[amicus_curious]

"dr_nikolaus_klepp" <dr.klepp@gmx.at> wrote in message 
news:2b749$49dbc4aa$557d7df2$824@news.inode.at...
> chrisv wrote:
>
> > > rat wrote:
> > > > Now that is more akin to the way that unsophisticates are lured into
> > > > using the "free" GPL code and then are hammered for their birthright by
> > > > the SFLC. "Ignorance is no excuse!", they say, "What's yours is now 
> > > > ours,
> > > > you have been touched!"
> >
> > So, you think software developers just grab source-code and use it in
> > their projects, just assuming that it's free of copyright?  That would
> > be pretty stupid, don't you think, considering all GPL'ed software
> > will declare and reference the GPL?  Do you think willfully ignoring
> > the copyright and GPL notification should be an "excuse"?
> >
> > Idiot.
>
> nice how you added that "idiot" :-)
Presumably that was facetious.  BTW, next to no one bothers with chrisv 
anymore.  He has little to say and nothing to contribute to any interesting 
conversations.  A minimal amount of lurking would tell you that.