[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:43:19 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) |
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Alan you have argued that the Usenet groups have been ruined by
> trolls. Why do you keep posting in the groups?
I was talking rather about this particular mailing list
(gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org). I post here to correct FUD and
misinformation, particularly that intended to undermine confidence in the
GPL, and especially because the list is owned by the GNU project.
> Sincerely,
> Rjack
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, (continued)
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/10
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/12
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/11
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/12
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/12
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/12
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/12
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/13
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/13
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/13
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/13