|
From: | RJack |
Subject: | Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak |
Date: | Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:57:42 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/8/2010 11:49 AM, RJack wrote:Sigh... I guess I'll just leave that argument to you and your agents to try on a federal judge in a copyright infringement case Hyman.Yes, exactly. Even if you were correct about downstream distributors not having authorization to distribute, which you are not, before this could be a court issue the rights holders would have to sue the downstream distributors for copyright infringement.
Since the rights holders want this distribution to occur, as evidenced by using the GPL as the license, this will never happen.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm... Keep spinnin' Hyman -- it won't help -- but keep spinnin' anyway. Sincerely, RJack
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |