[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenT
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:18:33 +0100 |
Take your meds, Hyman.
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> On 2/10/2010 11:02 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > ownership of
> > "computer source code" (aka a "computer program" work under 17 USC 101)
> > has nothing to do with ownership "as compiler" as in 17 USC 101
> > 'compilation'. Nor has it anything to do with ownership of separate and
> > independant works such "Pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works" under
> > 17 USC 101
>
> <http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane>
> In addition to the copyright notices, McFarlane registered
> copyright on the issues and the books.
> ... McFarlanes registrations no more revealed an intent to claim
> copyright in Gaimans contributions, as distinct from McFarlanes
> own contributions as compiler and illustrator, . . .
>
> Your reading comprehension is as lacking as always.
> Registration of copyright in a work is not a claim
> against any co-authors who may exist. It is a formal
> notice by an author that he has copyright in the work.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, David Kastrup, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, David Kastrup, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, David Kastrup, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, RJack, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/11
- Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk, RJack, 2010/02/11