[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:11:07 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> a collective work formed from the contributions of its
A collective work can also be a joint work you silly.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "
Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"
Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, John Hasler, 2010/02/22
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Victor Tarabola Cortiano, 2010/02/22
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/15
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/15
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/16
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Rex Ballard, 2010/02/12