[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:45:19 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> I have explained how verification can be accomplished - use the
> sources to build the binary, and see if that binary matches the
> distributed one.
Why don't you try to perform your own verification and post here the
results, silly Hyman?
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "
Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
P.P.S. "We do not believe that the Copyright Act permits holders of
rights under copyrights to choose third parties to bring suits on their
behalf. While F.R. Civ. P. 17(a) ordinarily permits the real party in
interest to ratify a suit brought by another party, the Copyright Law is
quite specific in stating that only the "owner of an exclusive right
under a copyright" may bring suit."
Hyman's lovin'
http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F3/402/881/510088/
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, (continued)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/17
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Richard Tobin, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/18