[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:40:01 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Calling something intentionally different a corresponding source without
> it being so in order to fulfill licensing conditions would be active
> fraud, not just negligence.
Uh silly dak. Breaching unenforceable contractual "licensing conditions"
is "fraud" only in hilarious brain free zone known as the GNU Republic.
LMAO! Uh retard Hyman.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, (continued)
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/19
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, RJack, 2010/02/18
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Miles Bader, 2010/02/22
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Victor Tarabola Cortiano, 2010/02/22
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Miles Bader, 2010/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: The SFLC dismissals should be coming soon, John Hasler, 2010/02/22