[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:14:42 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Well, if the GPLed source is made available in the aftermath, it stands
How do you know that, silly dak?
Because "the version numbers on the links match," right you retard?
Given that comrade Hyman is "insufficiently motivated to go set up a
GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." LOL why don't YOU dak go
and try make a test trying to create
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp binary from the
source tarball available on the actiontec's site dak?
Please report back to us your results and evidence that the said source
code is "complete corresponding source code under the GPL."
TIA.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/20
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/19
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/22
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/22