[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:35:30 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> But throwing out the whole "AGB" part does not help the defendant one
> bit, so there was likely nothing to be gained by contesting this part of
> the reasoning.
Das Gericht hat rechtsfehlerhafter Weise die
Prüfung eines Verstoßes von Art.81 EGV u. §1 GWB
unterlassen.
Das Urteil ist diesbezüglich *offensichtlich* falsch, denn
einerseits wird die GPL als AGB bezeichnet, andererseits
aber wie ein Individualrechtsgeschäft (read: Individualvertrag)
behandelt, um den §139 BGB anwenden zu können. So geht es nicht!
§139 ist nicht auf AGB anwendbar.
Wenn Klauseln in AGB unwirksam sind, so gilt
nicht §139 BGB sondern §306 BGB. Danach ist
nicht, wie das Gericht irrtümlich meint, der
gesamte Lizenzvertrag nichtig, sondern der
Vertrag bleibt wirksam und nur die
nichtige Klausel wird durch gesetzliche
Vorschriften ersetzt.
Das Urteil könnte in der Berufung durchaus anders
ausfallen. Die vielen Schreibfehler im Urteil
sind ebenfalls bemerkenswert.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, (continued)
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Hey Alan, please help comrade dak grok the following, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, RJack, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23
- Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/23