[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Settlements
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Settlements |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:12:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/26/2010 3:58 PM, RJack wrote:
One can only hope that she has an opportunity to appear before the
United States Supreme Court!
Judges don't appear before the Supreme Court in the U.S.
An unlicensed use of the copyright is not an infringement unless it
conflicts with one of the specific exclusive rights conferred by the
copyright statute.
The unlicensed use in these cases is copying and distribution,
exactly as specified in 17 USC 106. The use is unlicensed when
the copier fails to meet the conditions required by the GPL in
order for permission to copy and distribute to be granted.
- Re: Settlements, (continued)
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/27
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/27
- Re: Settlements, John Hasler, 2010/02/27
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/28
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, RJack, 2010/02/26
- Re: Settlements, Hyman Rosen, 2010/02/28
- Re: Settlements, David Kastrup, 2010/02/27