Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:

[... Pee Jays therom ...]

>     a covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to do

What part of YOU INDICATE ACCEPTANCE don't you understand retard dak?
ACCEPTANCE is a contract thing, idiot.

"Whether this [act] constitutes a gratuitous license, or one for a
reasonable compensation, must, of course, depend upon the circumstances;
but the relation between the parties thereafter in respect of any suit
brought must be held to be contractual, and not an unlawful invasion of
the rights of the owner." De Forest Radio Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United
States, 273 U.S. 236, (1927) 

"Whether express or implied, a license is a contract 'governed by
ordinary principles of state contract law.'" McCoy v. Mitsuboshi
Cutlery, Inc., 67. F.3d 917, (Fed. Cir. 1995) 

regards,
alexander.
        
P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)