|
From: | c_stuff |
Subject: | Re: A drunken judge in the SDNY |
Date: | Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:00:45 -0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
On 8/22/2010 1:01 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Of course not. How is stating that you're mistaken got anything to do with Erik Andersen? More precisely, you're probably mistaken about the applicability of the court decision you cited. Anyhow, as I've already said, if you're right, then the defendants will appeal and get their money back.
Besides thin air, what's your basis for stating I'm mistaken? Even Hyman Rosen attempts to document a few of his assertions. The defendants may or may not appeal. That's a contingency. Sincerely, RJack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |