|
From: | Hyman Rosen |
Subject: | Re: Sharing the GPL source code, with value addition by vendor specificto his hardware? |
Date: | Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:03:41 -0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 |
On 10/12/2010 11:45 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
The GPL is a straightforward copyright license. Each time a court has had an opportunity to read it, they regarded it as such.To which federal courts are you referring?The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals: <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3689055814945636124>Uh silly Hyman...the GPL ... is a cooperative agreement that facilitates production of new derivative worksThe BSD agreement facilitates production of new derivative works even more.
Your fellow crank asked which federal courts looked at the GPL as a valid copyright license, and I responded with a number of examples. Why are you referring to a different license?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |