gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:06:18 -0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 
On 6/17/2011 9:35 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:

SFLC claimed "settlements" without documentation and you were

> agreeingly happy with such claims. Why the difference now, Hyman?

Because a statement by one of the parties to a suit is
different from a statement by a third party who has no
inside knowledge of the case. Best Buy did not say that
they had been paid attorney's fee. SFLC did not say that
it had paid attorney's fees.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]