[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font-relative-size
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Font-relative-size |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:13:41 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> > the font-relative-size, is it then so that in paper23 frs1 corresponds
> > to 26/23 = 1.13 while in paper16 it corresponds to 20/16 = 1.25...?
> > I could probably make a Scheme Function doing this, but will I be
> > re-inventing the wheel? Have I misunderstood something?
>
> I think that's the way it works today. An obvious extension would
> be to be able to specify a relative staff space that matches the
> relative font sizes.
I think we should change the relative size to be geometrical in
effect, like TeX's magstep, and make staff-symbol obey relative size
as well, (ie. allowing to set staff-space using
StaffSymbol \override #'relative-staff-space = #-1,
for combining with #'relative-size = #-1)
>
> /Mats
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/