[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Jazz chord issue
From: |
Jeff Henrikson |
Subject: |
Jazz chord issue |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:41:56 -0400 |
Am I correct in assuming that we should postpone discussions of the "right
answer" to jazz chords until 1.4? It seemed to me that
there were way to many new concepts necessary to be thrown in now. The issues
raised include:
1) changing to a more graphical representation of chord symbols does not allow
for abstractification of stylistic preferences
(triangle 7 vs. maj7, minus vs small m, etc.)
2) a strictly graphical representation does not transpose. (I addressed this
hackishly by suggesting regular expression
substitution. I take it back, as this totally defiles the concept that we can
substitute the is/es sharp/flat convention with
other languages.)
One I have brought up in the past:
3) the text layout capabilities (especially collision avoidance) seemed
nonexistent or very primitive last I checked. Backing out
to TeX for symbol layout makes this automatically braindead, since the box
cannot be sized beforehand without reproducing the
functionality of TeX, in which case you may as well lay out the symbol
yourself. I will check this behavior in the release of the
moment when I get to it and read enough of the source to understand why before
I make suggestions.
Jeff Henrikson
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Jazz chord issue,
Jeff Henrikson <=