[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package format/management ramblingss
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Package format/management ramblingss |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 12:28:36 -0400 |
> However, having some sort of per-user customizability might be
> nice too. Each user could have a package subdir of his home dir.
Does this mean the user ``contributes'' packages to the system?
I don't like this, consider the following scenario: user A install a
package foo-1.1 that contains a trojan. User B tries to run this
program unknowingly; and thus gets infected by the trojan (consider
the harm this would do if user B is root).
I think this is a misunderstanding. Whatever packages user A
specifies will only affect user A.
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, (continued)
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Soeren D. Schulze, 2004/08/10
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/10
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/11
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Richard Stallman, 2004/08/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Richard Stallman, 2004/08/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/08
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Soeren D. Schulze, 2004/08/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/08/08