gnuastro-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnuastro-commits] master cef9326: Corrected two small typos in book


From: Mohammad Akhlaghi
Subject: [gnuastro-commits] master cef9326: Corrected two small typos in book
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:15:39 -0400 (EDT)

branch: master
commit cef9326742c9f5962c2493385190100b5a694dde
Author: Mohammad Akhlaghi <address@hidden>
Commit: Mohammad Akhlaghi <address@hidden>

    Corrected two small typos in book
    
    Two small typos were found and fixed in the book.
---
 doc/gnuastro.texi | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/gnuastro.texi b/doc/gnuastro.texi
index 5a67e31..93ed4cf 100644
--- a/doc/gnuastro.texi
+++ b/doc/gnuastro.texi
@@ -22124,10 +22124,10 @@ are fixed width types, these types are portable to 
all systems and are
 defined in the standard C header @file{stdint.h}. You don't need to include
 this header, it is included by any Gnuastro header that deals with the
 different types. However, the most commonly used types in a C (or C++)
-program (for example @code{int} or @code{long} are not defined by their
-exact width (storage), but by their minimum storage. So for example on some
-systems, @code{int} may be 2 bytes (16-bits, the minimum required by the
-standard) and on others it may be 4 bytes (32-bits, common in modern
+program (for example @code{int} or @code{long}) are not defined by their
+exact width (storage size), but by their minimum storage. So for example on
+some systems, @code{int} may be 2 bytes (16-bits, the minimum required by
+the standard) and on others it may be 4 bytes (32-bits, common in modern
 systems).
 
 With every type, a unique ``blank'' value (or place holder showing the
@@ -28396,7 +28396,7 @@ language, but it can be considered one of the 
lowest-level languages among
 all high-level languages.} (closer to the hardware), it is much less
 complex for both the human reader @emph{and} the computer. The benefits of
 simplicity for a human were discussed above. Simplicity for the computer
-translates into more efficiently (faster) programs. This creates a much
+translates into more efficient (faster) programs. This creates a much
 closer relation between the scientist/programmer (or their program) and the
 actual data and processing. The GNU coding
 address@hidden@url{http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/}} also encourage



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]