Re: [open-cobol-list] Non-Standard Level numbers

[Sergey Kashyrin]

Bill,

Thanks for the reference. Unfortunately I don't feel that it is correct 
explanation of the reality.
I've implemented that in a little bit different way in OC but I think it's 
valid.
I'm inserting a fake FILLER instead of pushing the level for a variable.
i.e.
01 A.
   05 B.
        10 C PIC X.
  04 D.
        05 E PIC X.

will be converted to
01 A.
  04 FILLER.
   05 B.
        10 C PIC X.
  04 D.
        05 E PIC X.

IBM explanation is that D will go to the same level as B. But they've left out 
of discussion what will happen to E in this case.

Regards,
Sergey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Klein" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:24 PM
Subject: [open-cobol-list] Non-Standard Level numbers


> For documentation on how IBM handles "non-Standard" level numbers, see:
>
> http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/igy3lr30/5.1.6.2
>
>
> and look at the section beginning,
>
> "You can also define groups with subordinate items that have different
> level-numbers for the same level in the hierarchy."
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> open-cobol-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list