[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?
From: |
Duke Normandin |
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:12:29 -0600 (MDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, John Culleton wrote:
[snip]
> > BTW, I still have not found an explanation of how the free format
> > differs from the fixed. Is it only Col 1-6 that is done away
> > with?
> Column 7 which is used for special signals is merged somehow with
> column 1. Haven't quite figured out those rules yet. Columns 73-80
> have been eliminated even in the TRAD format. Back in the day we
> used to put the change date of updated statements out there.
> Handy.
>
> Now you can use upper case, lower case, or even a mixture.
To re-cap the free format:
Sequential Line # are not used
Col 1 is now used for * - /
Area A is still necessary - but now begins in Col 2
Area B is still necessary - but now begins in Col 6
Is that correct?
--
duke
- [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/05
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, David Essex, 2009/08/05
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/05
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, David Essex, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, David Essex, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, John Culleton, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, John Culleton, 2009/08/07
Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, Gary Cutler, 2009/08/05
Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?, John Culleton, 2009/08/06