gnucobol-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[open-cobol-list] OO in pure C behind the scenes?


From: Patrick
Subject: [open-cobol-list] OO in pure C behind the scenes?
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 20:08:51 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5

Hi Everyone

So my Cobol studies are coming along well, if I am not working to feed by kids or looking after them, I am studying Cobol. I bought 7 more books.

I know C but I don't think I am amazing at it by any means.

I would really like to become an open Cobol developer in a year or so but I will need to study C and Cobol in order to be of any use.

C++ scares me. People beat up C but not like C++. It really seems like a huge language with the weak C core.

I can program in C++ but I am concerned about writing excellent quality code in C++

I am thinking about reading this book:
http://www.planetpdf.com/codecuts/pdfs/ooc.pdf

and studying OO in vanilla C.

It is my understanding that OO has been available in ANSI C for a long time. It just sounds like it is just so butt ugly as to be hard to use.

If we implement OO in pure C behind the scenes, the ugliness would not matter.

Is it fair to say we don't really have a primary developer right now? Is it fair to say that it is unlikely that we will have a primary developer that is capable of writing mission critical C++?

Does anyone think that sticking with C would maintain an approachable project for new developers to start with?

-Patrick


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]