Re: [gnugo-devel] trevor_3_12.6 (tuning)

[Gunnar Farneback]

Arend wrote:
> > > +; lib(B)>1 || !oplay_attack(*,a,B,*)
> >
> > This pattern looks slightly bogus. The liberty constraint makes little
> > sense since the only unknown liberty is the lower left x in the
> > pattern; better not to have a wildcard there. Besides, as written it
> > doesn't match the referenced position and the reading constraint tries
> > to play on top of an existing stone.
> 
> I think you misread "||" as "&&".

Ouch, yes, indeed. My bad.

> However, shouldn't finding the move "*" rather be the job of the optics
> code? (I don't know.)

Currently the optics code isn't involved with lunches at all, which I
consider a weakness. My long term plans for the optics code include a
change of this. Whether it should be able to handle this case I'm not
sure.

/Gunnar