[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603 |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:33:31 -0700 |
> Not sure how much sense it makes to have this as a regression test, as
> long as we have no machinery whatsoever (as you explained) to see why
> a 3 point reverse sente could be worth less than a 5 point gote.
It may make sense to have problems for which we have no machinery
yet to solve them.
For example we've been discussing another problem century2002:180
in which there is no method in the engine for recognizing that
making or preventing seki is worth a few points.
Dan
[gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, kevin yong, 2003/04/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, bump, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, bump, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Arend Bayer, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603,
bump <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Arend Bayer, 2003/04/11
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, bump, 2003/04/11
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, bump, 2003/04/11
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Arend Bayer, 2003/04/11
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress gunnar:8, kevin yong, 2003/04/11
[gnugo-devel] regress lazarus:1, kevin yong, 2003/04/12