[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress lazarus:1
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] regress lazarus:1 |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Apr 2003 21:08:07 -0700 |
Kevin wrote:
> i had a quick look at regress case lazarus:1.
>
> problem: L2 wrong, L3 right.
>
> based on my observation, i think L2 is ok. after
> B:L2, if W:L3 or W:N4 cut, then:
> B:O2 W:P2 B:P1 W:O1 B:Q1 W:O2 B:M1.
>
> please correct me if i m wrong.
You are right, L2 is OK. It looks like it leaves bad aji
compared with L3 but actually W can't do much.
Evan wrote:
> After B:L2, W:O3, B:O2, W leaves the stones on the right and plays W:K2 to
> get a living group on the left. In contrast, B L3 kills all the stones.
> However, either is better than the game move of P2.
After B:L2, W:O3 B can play K2 and W can't do anything. It
could get a little complicated with something like
B:L2 W:O3 B:K2 W:P2 B:N3 W:O1 B:Q1 W:P1 B:M1 O:O4
but black wins the semeai by one move.
Dan
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, bump, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, bump, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Arend Bayer, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress endgame:603, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress gunnar:8, kevin yong, 2003/04/11
- [gnugo-devel] regress lazarus:1, kevin yong, 2003/04/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress lazarus:1, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress lazarus:1,
bump <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress gunnar:8, kevin yong, 2003/04/13
- Re: [gnugo-devel] regress gunnar:8, Evan Berggren Daniel, 2003/04/13
- [gnugo-devel] sente analysis, kevin yong, 2003/04/20
- Re: [gnugo-devel] sente analysis, Paul Pogonyshev, 2003/04/20