[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n
From: |
Douglas Ridgway |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2004 14:32:13 -0600 (MDT) |
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Gunnar Farnebäck wrote:
> Douglas wrote:
> > > The generators which have problems with the low order bits are much
> > > less sophisticated than this one, and the tests shown in the paper
> > > confirm that we do not need to worry about the distribution of
> > > specific bits.
> >
> > Hm, all I can find is stuff about the leading bits, and how far down good
> > properties extend.
>
> Hm, the paper is more difficult to get into than I remembered and it's
> not quite clear to me now exactly what the equidistribution properties
> mean.
For anyone curious, I have copies of the first and second papers at
http://dridgway.com/tgfsr.pdf and
http://dridgway.com/tgfsr2.pdf .
doug.
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/05/13
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n, David G Doshay, 2004/05/13
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n, Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/05/13
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n, Douglas Ridgway, 2004/05/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n, Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/05/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n, Arend Bayer, 2004/05/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n, Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/05/13
- Re: [gnugo-devel] rand() % n,
Douglas Ridgway <=