Re: [gnugo-devel] gprintf("%r"...) (was: large_scale_5_1.1b)

[bump]

> I think it would be useful to keep the board library separate. E.g. that way,
> it can be used by other projects. So I would like to propose to revert
> this as below.

It seems to me that the %r output is much more useful
for debugging than the %s output. So I propose
the following.

Dan

Index: engine/printutils.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gnugo/gnugo/engine/printutils.c,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -r1.45 printutils.c
--- engine/printutils.c 23 Apr 2004 03:06:36 -0000      1.45
+++ engine/printutils.c 2 Jun 2004 12:49:01 -0000
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 \* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
 
 #include "board.h"
-#include "gnugo.h"
 #include "hash.h"
 #include "gg_utils.h"
 
@@ -85,19 +84,19 @@
        case 0:             
          fprintf(outputfile, "%s", "0");
          break;
-       case KO_B:          
+       case 1:          
          fprintf(outputfile, "%s", "KO_B");
          break;
-       case LOSS:          
+       case 2:          
          fprintf(outputfile, "%s", "LOSS");
          break;
-       case GAIN:          
+       case 3:          
          fprintf(outputfile, "%s", "GAIN");
          break;
-       case KO_A:          
+       case 4:          
          fprintf(outputfile, "%s", "KO_A");
          break;
-       case WIN:           
+       case 5:           
          fprintf(outputfile, "%s", "WIN");
          break;