[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: [computer-go] Competition of the GO-algorithms
From: |
Gunnar Farnebäck |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: [computer-go] Competition of the GO-algorithms |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Dec 2004 05:41:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.9) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
I wrote:
> Thanks. The major problem here is that C11 isn't tested as an
> additional owl defense for B16. It seems most appropriate to force
> that by adding a connection move reason, so I propose the following
> revision of ED91:
Appended as patch below. No effects on the regressions.
- tuning
/Gunnar
Index: patterns/patterns.db
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gnugo/gnugo/patterns/patterns.db,v
retrieving revision 1.134
diff -u -r1.134 patterns.db
--- patterns/patterns.db 24 Nov 2004 04:35:51 -0000 1.134
+++ patterns/patterns.db 4 Dec 2004 20:03:50 -0000
@@ -10928,25 +10928,23 @@
Pattern ED91
# db New pattern (3.1.28)
+# gf Changed to connection pattern. (3.7.2)
-???..o? Extend after the push
-???XXoo
-?O..O*.
-?O....o
-o......
--------
+??XXoo Extend after the push
+O..O*.
+O....o
+......
+------
-:8,j
+:8,C
-???..o?
-???XXfo
-?O.aO*.
-?Ocbd.o
-o.e....
--------
+??XXoo
+a..O*.
+a....o
+......
+------
-; oplay_attack(*,a,b,c,d,e,e) || !oplay_defend(*,a,b,d,c,d)
-> replace(f,*)
+;!oplay_disconnect(*,*,a)
Pattern ED92