Re: XHTML quicker ?

[Davi Leal]

Victor Engmark wrote:
> Davi Leal wrote:
> > making it slow to parse,
> > What is a millisecond more?
>
> If you're willing to build a site with the goal of having hundreds or
> thousands of users with that attitude, this discussion is moot. Besides,
> I'm not talking about milliseconds. The fastest I could get the GNU Herds
> front page <https://www.gnuherds.org/> to load, in beta, on a Sunday
> evening, is 0.765 seconds (measured with Fasterfox, after reloading some 20
> times). That page doesn't even use any (non-trivial) JavaScript. The Update
> person data<https://www.gnuherds.org/Person.php>page was even slower - I
> couldn't get it below 2 seconds. Unless the code
> scales brilliantly (leaving the browser as the only bottleneck), you'll
> lose a lot of potential users.

Well, I agree with you it is good idea to try XHTML, and compare it with 
others options.

Davi