[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:00:03 +0200 |
> Karsten> I tend to agree. However it is a bit hard to be fair
> Karsten> here. Currently we still know who is in production and who
> Karsten> isn't. Should that happen to get out of bounds I do believe
> Karsten> there's a business model to be had.
>
> If the bug is found in released version which is the ONLY version
> supposed to be run in production - otherwise devs cannot give you any
> guarantee - then it has to be fixed according to bug's 'natural'
> priority assigned in the tracker, i.e. no need for special business
> model.
Well, I don't have the spare time to do it. Other's may - or they may not. In
that case they may decide that triaging bugs, tracking down bug details,
taking care a deployment site gets updated etc is a nice support task to
be sold to a client. With which I don't see a problem even with GNUmed
being open source.
Karsten
--
GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/address@hidden
- [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed & blueprints, Gour, 2008/09/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed & blueprints, James Busser, 2008/09/06
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Gour, 2008/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, James Busser, 2008/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Gour, 2008/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Gour, 2008/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Gour, 2008/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Jerzy Luszawski, 2008/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Gour, 2008/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed & blueprints, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/09/08