[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: <bug>: :) first 0.3.2 bug ?? - In production I wa
From: |
James Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: <bug>: :) first 0.3.2 bug ?? - In production I was |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:44:18 -0700 |
On 13-Sep-08, at 12:10 PM, Gour wrote:
By looking at code it looks (I do not have GNUmed 0.3.2 installed atm)
that there is choice to which address one sends.
Things are not yet smooth:
1. the 0.3.2 client does not appear by default to send auto-generated
bugs to gnumed-bugs (it does not by default send anywhere... the
sendto field within the dialog is empty and must be filled-in by the
user. The current implementation is likely to reduce auto-generated
bug reports going to gnumed-bugs.
2. the 0.3.2 client does not currently appear to "default" to gnumed-
bugs even *after* I though I suitably re-configured the tarball conf
file and then the /etc/gnumed/ conf file values for
helpdesk
as already reported yesterday in the email
Re: [Gnumed-devel] unhandled exceptions and local database "in-
production"
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnumed-devel/2008-09/msg00440.html
3. I did manually address at least one autogenerated bug to gnumed-
bugs but on leaning that Gour did not see any I discovered that
gnumed-bugs was set to require moderation for all posts. therefore in
the queue waiting approval were 3 emails which I have now sent through.
I have also unset the requires-moderation bit for the four currently-
subscribed addresses (karsten's, mine, the gnumed A'T gmx.net address
which is used by the unhandled exception auto-emailer and the gnumed
A'T gmail.com address used by Gour.
I don't anticipate sending anything to gnumed-bugs, except any thing
that appears to be not-yet-reported 0.3.2 bugs and to send these via
the unhandled exception auto-emailer.
[Gnumed-devel] Re: <bug>: :) first 0.3.2 bug ?? - In production I was, Gour, 2008/09/13